On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 16:56 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 12:17 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > I think ultimately we need both, a real world user of webkit and also a > > webkit-ptest type package too. They both let us test different things, > > one probably more quickly than the other, with the other being more > > complete. > > Well, logically that would mean that we'd need a real-world user of > webkit for every port (or at least, for the three ports that are > currently supportable within oe-core). It's not obvious that this would > scale very well. > > What are the things that you think would be tested better with midori > than with the standalone launcher and test wrappers?
What does the standalone launcher give you? What I'm thinking is that having a browser interface QA can click on from the desktop and enter say 5 urls into is fast yet tests a significant amount of the system, much like booting X on a system doesn't test everything but it does test a fair amount of simple things like whether the binaries work. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
