On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:18 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:04 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > With that in mind, I think some kind of HTML support in OE-Core is > > important going forward. Equally, I dislike having things there which we > > cannot test. I know some people have looked into this and it appears > > midori is the best option for something with a small number of > > additional dependencies. I therefore currently think this is something > > we should make a decision to include since it gives us significantly > > better coverage of things like webkit which are a already in the core > > yet totally untested at present. > > WebKit itself comes with a bunch of test wrappers (and tests!) for > different platforms and if the aim of the exercise is to test webkit > then it seems like maybe we should just be installing and using those. > Midori would be fine for testing the parts of webkit that it uses, but > obviously it doesn't exercise anything other than the Gtk port which > still leaves you with a bit of a hole in your coverage.
I think ultimately we need both, a real world user of webkit and also a webkit-ptest type package too. They both let us test different things, one probably more quickly than the other, with the other being more complete. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
