Hi Koen,
I was told you are the person to contact about MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so may
you please have a look to the patch below - also available here :
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2012/
Actually, when compiling modules (out of tree), we loose PR if
MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is not set.
Is this patch fine to solve this problem or is there another prefered way ?
The same problem was already solved in kernel.bbclass by the following
comit
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=35e7b34d3b5b96ed11bc7ed6b2a5d08e6183d8a3
Thanks,
Eric
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard<[email protected]>
---
classes/module-base.bbclass | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/module-base.bbclass b/classes/module-base.bbclass
index bc53e1b..9aaaa4e 100644
--- a/classes/module-base.bbclass
+++ b/classes/module-base.bbclass
@@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ export CROSS_COMPILE = "${TARGET_PREFIX}"
# A machine.conf or local.conf can increase MACHINE_KERNEL_PR to force
# rebuilds for kernel and external modules
-PR = "${MACHINE_KERNEL_PR}"
+python __anonymous () {
+ machine_kernel_pr = bb.data.getVar('MACHINE_KERNEL_PR', d, True)
+
+ if machine_kernel_pr:
+ bb.data.setVar('PR', machine_kernel_pr, d)
+}
export KERNEL_VERSION =
"$...@base_read_file('${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/kernel-abiversion')}"
export KERNEL_SOURCE =
"$...@base_read_file('${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}/kernel-source')}"
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
