Le 14/05/2010 21:55, Phil Blundell a écrit :
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 19:45 +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
so why not setting r0 as a default in bitbake.conf as a compromise ?
A default MACHINE_KERNEL_PR, you mean? That would cause PR to suddenly
go backwards for a whole bunch of machines, which would definitely not
be a good thing. See the mailing list archive; there was quite a lot of
discussion of these kinds of issues at the time that the M_K_PR change
was originally landed.
yes, in this case MACHINE_KERNEL_PR would overide kernel's PR which is
not what we want.
So actually the fix I propose is needed as while MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is
not required by policy, module-base.bbclass is broken for machines
without MACHINE_KERNEL_PR.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
