-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14-05-10 19:17, Eric Bénard wrote: > Le 14/05/2010 17:52, Koen Kooi a écrit : >> Op 14 mei 2010, om 17:10 heeft Eric Bénard het volgende geschreven: >>> I was told you are the person to contact about MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so >>> may you please have a look to the patch below - also available here : >>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2012/ >>> >>> Actually, when compiling modules (out of tree), we loose PR if >>> MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is not set. >> >> I don't believe that when MACHINE_KERNEL_PR isn't set people care >> about PR. >> > Does that mean that policy is that MACHINE_KERNEL_PR should be set for > every machine ? > If yes, maybe this should be added in the doc.
IMO yes, but some people were against it. Either their kernel never changes or they don't care about out-of-tree modules breaking on kernel changes. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFL7YmVMkyGM64RGpERAsf2AJ45yUaAIVL0HCm7jCfxwkmq9C5gnACfcV8w vGcI7BJka3fCXJJ+RL3Y+Yc= =RLGB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
