Le 14/05/2010 19:34, Koen Kooi a écrit :
On 14-05-10 19:17, Eric Bénard wrote:
Le 14/05/2010 17:52, Koen Kooi a écrit :
Op 14 mei 2010, om 17:10 heeft Eric Bénard het volgende geschreven:
I was told you are the person to contact about MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so
may you please have a look to the patch below - also available here :
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2012/
Actually, when compiling modules (out of tree), we loose PR if
MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is not set.
I don't believe that when MACHINE_KERNEL_PR isn't set people care
about PR.
Does that mean that policy is that MACHINE_KERNEL_PR should be set for
every machine ?
If yes, maybe this should be added in the doc.
IMO yes, but some people were against it. Either their kernel never
changes or they don't care about out-of-tree modules breaking on kernel
changes.
so why not setting r0 as a default in bitbake.conf as a compromise ?
Eric
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
