On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:52, Andreas Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday 19 February 2011 10:45:38 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> I am fine with the patch, but perhaps a better solution would be to >> introduce a var to decide whether it is a fatal or not. >> That way people distro's that use libtool 2.4 can decide to make it a >> fatal. (or individual users in their local.conf) >> >> Frans > How comes that I sometimes feel handled as spammer ;-) ? > > see http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011- > February/029534.html > > anyway - treating RPATH errors as fatal has lead to many QA fixes and further > will follow... > > my opinion now: keep RPATH errors fatal as developer's whip :-)
I agree about keeping it configurable. Besides I think that we ought to keep it fatal until quite near of release since we'll be "forced" to fix most of many of them. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
