2011/2/20 Tom Rini <[email protected]>: > On 02/20/2011 05:42 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> >> 2011/2/19 Tom Rini<[email protected]>: >>> >>> On 02/19/2011 06:26 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:52, Andreas Mueller<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday 19 February 2011 10:45:38 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am fine with the patch, but perhaps a better solution would be to >>>>>> introduce a var to decide whether it is a fatal or not. >>>>>> That way people distro's that use libtool 2.4 can decide to make it a >>>>>> fatal. (or individual users in their local.conf) >>>>>> >>>>>> Frans >>>>> >>>>> How comes that I sometimes feel handled as spammer ;-) ? >>>>> >>>>> see http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011- >>>>> February/029534.html >>>>> >>>>> anyway - treating RPATH errors as fatal has lead to many QA fixes and >>>>> further >>>>> will follow... >>>>> >>>>> my opinion now: keep RPATH errors fatal as developer's whip :-) >>>> >>>> I agree about keeping it configurable. >>>> >>>> Besides I think that we ought to keep it fatal until quite near of >>>> release since we'll be "forced" to fix most of many of them. >>> >>> I just want to state, again, that most of these just go away with libtool >>> 2.4. Now, if people are looking for something to work on that won't just >>> go >>> away with an update to libtool 2.4: >>> - iscsi-target needs some love again for various kernel versions as that >>> looks to be killing calamari and neek for nas-server-image >> >> Peeked at iscsi-target for calamari. Some inet fields have changed >> name in 2.6.32 or so, and apparently this is not handled fully. >> Instead of trying to fix it, I moved the calamari recipe to 2.6.34 >> (which I'm already using for half a year or so, but apparently never >> pushed). > > Thanks. > >> I'll also see if I can update the neek version (probably also by >> moving the kernel version forward. >> Tomorrow I'll discuss this with Walter who afaik is the only other neek >> user. > > Note that I also see: > - uclibc total failure, but I assume unsupported and I'll drop > - minimal fails everywhere else with: > ERROR: QA Issue with staging: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (workdir) in > path > /var/hudson/workspace/sb_openembedded_autobuilder/BBPKGS/native-sdk-image/DISTRO/minimal/MACHINE/neek/label/sb-u1004/tmp/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib > ERROR: QA Issue with staging: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (workdir) in > path > /var/hudson/workspace/sb_openembedded_autobuilder/BBPKGS/native-sdk-image/DISTRO/minimal/MACHINE/neek/label/sb-u1004/tmp/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib > ERROR: QA staging was broken by the package built above > > Also mentioned this on irc, I will try patch 719 that is suggested below, but this could be a toolchain issue (it would not be the first). Toolchain for nios is quite old (gcc 4.1.something, binutils 2.18.50.something). It should be able to build minimal-image for distro minimal and micro. And as far as I know neither uclibc nor eglibc are supported. THen again it has been a while since I managed to give this attention.
Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
