2011/2/20 Tom Rini <[email protected]>: > On 02/20/2011 05:42 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> >> 2011/2/19 Tom Rini<[email protected]>: >>> >>> On 02/19/2011 06:26 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:52, Andreas Mueller<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday 19 February 2011 10:45:38 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am fine with the patch, but perhaps a better solution would be to >>>>>> introduce a var to decide whether it is a fatal or not. >>>>>> That way people distro's that use libtool 2.4 can decide to make it a >>>>>> fatal. (or individual users in their local.conf) >>>>>> >>>>>> Frans >>>>> >>>>> How comes that I sometimes feel handled as spammer ;-) ? >>>>> >>>>> see http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011- >>>>> February/029534.html >>>>> >>>>> anyway - treating RPATH errors as fatal has lead to many QA fixes and >>>>> further >>>>> will follow... >>>>> >>>>> my opinion now: keep RPATH errors fatal as developer's whip :-) >>>> >>>> I agree about keeping it configurable. >>>> >>>> Besides I think that we ought to keep it fatal until quite near of >>>> release since we'll be "forced" to fix most of many of them. >>> >>> I just want to state, again, that most of these just go away with libtool >>> 2.4. Now, if people are looking for something to work on that won't just >>> go >>> away with an update to libtool 2.4: >>> - iscsi-target needs some love again for various kernel versions as that >>> looks to be killing calamari and neek for nas-server-image >> >> Peeked at iscsi-target for calamari. Some inet fields have changed >> name in 2.6.32 or so, and apparently this is not handled fully. >> Instead of trying to fix it, I moved the calamari recipe to 2.6.34 >> (which I'm already using for half a year or so, but apparently never >> pushed). > > Thanks. > >> I'll also see if I can update the neek version (probably also by >> moving the kernel version forward. >> Tomorrow I'll discuss this with Walter who afaik is the only other neek >> user. > > Note that I also see: > - uclibc total failure, but I assume unsupported and I'll drop > - minimal fails everywhere else with: > ERROR: QA Issue with staging: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (workdir) in > path > /var/hudson/workspace/sb_openembedded_autobuilder/BBPKGS/native-sdk-image/DISTRO/minimal/MACHINE/neek/label/sb-u1004/tmp/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib > ERROR: QA Issue with staging: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (workdir) in > path > /var/hudson/workspace/sb_openembedded_autobuilder/BBPKGS/native-sdk-image/DISTRO/minimal/MACHINE/neek/label/sb-u1004/tmp/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib > ERROR: QA staging was broken by the package built above >
Peeked some more itnto this. If I peek in ./nios2-linux/usr/lib/libsupc++.la I see: # libsupc++.la - a libtool library file # Generated by ltmain.sh - GNU libtool 1.4a-GCC3.0 (1.641.2.256 2001/05/28 20:09:07 with GCC-local changes) # # Please DO NOT delete this file! # It is necessary for linking the library. # The name that we can dlopen(3). dlname='' # Names of this library. library_names='' # The name of the static archive. old_library='libsupc++.a' # Libraries that this one depends upon. dependency_libs=' -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/work/nios2-linux/gcc-cross-4.1.2-r27.2/gcc-4.1.2/build.i686-linux.nios2-linux/nios2-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/work/nios2-linux/gcc-cross-4.1.2-r27.2/gcc-4.1.2/build.i686-linux.nios2-linux/nios2-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -lm -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/work/nios2-linux/gcc-cross-4.1.2-r27.2/gcc-4.1.2/build.i686-linux.nios2-linux/./gcc -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/nios2/nios2-linux/bin -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/nios2/nios2-linux/lib -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/nios2/lib/gcc/nios2-linux/4.1.2 -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/nios2/lib/gcc/nios2-linux/4.1.2/../../../../nios2-linux/lib -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/sysroots/nios2-linux/lib -L/home/frans/oe/tmp_minimal/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib -lgcc_s -lc -lgcc_s ... For other platforms I see # libsupc++.la - a libtool library file # Generated by libtool (GNU libtool 1.3134 2009-11-29) 2.2.7a # # Please DO NOT delete this file! # It is necessary for linking the library. # The name that we can dlopen(3). dlname='' # Names of this library. library_names='' # The name of the static archive. old_library='libsupc++.a' # Linker flags that can not go in dependency_libs. inherited_linker_flags='' # Libraries that this one depends upon. dependency_libs='' ... Note the different versions of libtool and the different dependency libs I guess the libsupc++ comes from gcc and nios2 has a very old gcc (4.1.2), but there is no newer version (nios2 support is not mainlined). Anyone a suggestion? Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
