On Sunday 20 February 2011 15:46:48 Tom Rini wrote: > On 02/20/2011 05:42 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > 2011/2/19 Tom Rini<[email protected]>: > >> On 02/19/2011 06:26 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 11:52, Andreas Mueller<[email protected]> > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>>> On Saturday 19 February 2011 10:45:38 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > >>>>> I am fine with the patch, but perhaps a better solution would be to > >>>>> introduce a var to decide whether it is a fatal or not. > >>>>> That way people distro's that use libtool 2.4 can decide to make it a > >>>>> fatal. (or individual users in their local.conf) > >>>>> > >>>>> Frans > >>>> > >>>> How comes that I sometimes feel handled as spammer ;-) ? > >>>> > >>>> see http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011- > >>>> February/029534.html > >>>> > >>>> anyway - treating RPATH errors as fatal has lead to many QA fixes and > >>>> further > >>>> will follow... > >>>> > >>>> my opinion now: keep RPATH errors fatal as developer's whip :-) > >>> > >>> I agree about keeping it configurable. > >>> > >>> Besides I think that we ought to keep it fatal until quite near of > >>> release since we'll be "forced" to fix most of many of them. > >> > >> I just want to state, again, that most of these just go away with > >> libtool 2.4. Now, if people are looking for something to work on that > >> won't just go away with an update to libtool 2.4: > >> - iscsi-target needs some love again for various kernel versions as that > >> looks to be killing calamari and neek for nas-server-image > > > > Peeked at iscsi-target for calamari. Some inet fields have changed > > name in 2.6.32 or so, and apparently this is not handled fully. > > Instead of trying to fix it, I moved the calamari recipe to 2.6.34 > > (which I'm already using for half a year or so, but apparently never > > pushed). > > Thanks. > > > I'll also see if I can update the neek version (probably also by > > moving the kernel version forward. > > Tomorrow I'll discuss this with Walter who afaik is the only other neek > > user. > > Note that I also see: > - uclibc total failure, but I assume unsupported and I'll drop > - minimal fails everywhere else with: > ERROR: QA Issue with staging: libsupc++.la failed sanity test (workdir) > in path > /var/hudson/workspace/sb_openembedded_autobuilder/BBPKGS/native-sdk-image/D > ISTRO/minimal/MACHINE/neek/label/sb-u1004/tmp/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib > ERROR: QA Issue with staging: libstdc++.la failed sanity test (workdir) in > path > /var/hudson/workspace/sb_openembedded_autobuilder/BBPKGS/native-sdk-image/D > ISTRO/minimal/MACHINE/neek/label/sb-u1004/tmp/sysroots/nios2-linux/usr/lib > ERROR: QA staging was broken by the package built above Can you try this with the cross.bbclass patch?
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
