Hi Rafiu,
Rafiu Fakunle wrote:
Jason,
1) It's dynamic versioning package management and repository format
which is largely unproven and has been shrugged off by most of the open
source projects so far. Conary itself has such a high turnover rate that
even regular scheduled update projects are staying away from it. I've
had conversations with various people, over the last year and a half,
about Conary - and mostly people agree its too nascent to deploy in a
stable environ.
2) Enterprise kernel with support for more filesystems (ext3, XFS,
reiser4 etc)
Enterprise by what standards ? its neither a Redhat nor Suse setup, and
apart from them and Ubuntu, I seriously doubt anyone has the resources
to really stabilise and maintain such an Enterprise setup. But then I
suppose the word 'Enterprise' itself is quite a loose term, might imply
many things.
btw, a number of xfs upstream have just moved to Redhat, with sgi under
chap.11
3) Kernel closely tracks upstream
what is upstream for rpath ? do you have a url with detals / I've just
had a look on their website and cant find anything.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Openfiler-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users
