Hi Karanbir,
Please move this thread/post to openfiler-devel
R.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Rafiu,
Rafiu Fakunle wrote:
Jason,
1) It's dynamic versioning package management and repository format
which is largely unproven and has been shrugged off by most of the
open source projects so far. Conary itself has such a high turnover
rate that even regular scheduled update projects are staying away from
it. I've had conversations with various people, over the last year and
a half, about Conary - and mostly people agree its too nascent to
deploy in a stable environ.
2) Enterprise kernel with support for more filesystems (ext3, XFS,
reiser4 etc)
Enterprise by what standards ? its neither a Redhat nor Suse setup,
and apart from them and Ubuntu, I seriously doubt anyone has the
resources to really stabilise and maintain such an Enterprise setup.
But then I suppose the word 'Enterprise' itself is quite a loose term,
might imply many things.
btw, a number of xfs upstream have just moved to Redhat, with sgi
under chap.11
3) Kernel closely tracks upstream
what is upstream for rpath ? do you have a url with detals / I've just
had a look on their website and cant find anything.
_______________________________________________
Openfiler-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openfiler.com/mailman/listinfo/openfiler-users
