Em terça-feira, 8 de fevereiro de 2011, às 12:15:34, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu: > On 02/08/11 02:16, ext Kevin Wu Won wrote: > > "W10 Diff revision to revision" should be at least a 3, maybe a 4. > > that's not so easy when you are confronted with entire branches. > re-ordering commits makes things hard, and it's virtually impossible to > correlate versions once you refactor (split or squash) commits. so while > i would applaud anyone who implements something which is actually > useful, this isn't something we should over-prioritize.
I guess that revision-to-revision diffs wouldn't be used for full branch
reviews, but it's useful to have it anyway. If a suggestion is made to change
only a few things, I'd like to quickly see what changes were made since the
contribution was last submitted.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Opengov mailing list Opengov@qt-labs.org http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov
