On Friday 04 February 2011 17:22:09 ext Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Thiago and I spent a few hours yesterday brainstorming about
> requirements for the review tool. Here's the list we came up with:
> 
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AmiZdoBOliRYdEptNEk2Y1pzeTZoY0RRRW
> t1ZW9IaFE&hl=en
> 
> The weights are based on our initial gut-feel, but we'd like feedback on:
> 
>     - Should the features be weighed differently?
>     - Are there other features we want to see in this tool?

>     - Are there other tools than the ones listed that we should survey?

 - github 
 - revieweboard

> The plan is to do the surveying and discussions here on the mailing
> list. See the rating key in the document for how to rate candidates.
> 
> I'll update the document accordingly when we reach somewhat consensus :-)
_______________________________________________
Opengov mailing list
Opengov@qt-labs.org
http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov

Reply via email to