On 02/08/11 13:30, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em terça-feira, 8 de fevereiro de 2011, às 12:15:34, Oswald Buddenhagen
> escreveu:
>    
>> that's not so easy when you are confronted with entire branches.
>>
> I guess that revision-to-revision diffs wouldn't be used for full branch
> reviews, but it's useful to have it anyway. If a suggestion is made to change
> only a few things, I'd like to quickly see what changes were made since the
> contribution was last submitted.
>
>    
the point is that every submission is a branch. a single commit is a 
special case (even if a somewhat common one). so the system would have 
to employ some heuristics trying to match up commits. in the easiest 
case it could simply give up on anything which has more than one commit, 
but this would severely limits its usefulness.
_______________________________________________
Opengov mailing list
Opengov@qt-labs.org
http://lists.qt-labs.org/listinfo/opengov

Reply via email to