Anton -

I agree that is the right place for this.

--michael


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] HPI GUI application proposal
>
>
> Corrent.
>
> I suggest new subdirectory here:
> http://openhpi.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openhpi/
>
> At the same level as openhpi, hpiview, hpiview2, subagent.
>
>    Anton Pak
>
> > Anton -
> >
> > That sounds good.  So in this proposed organization, the HPI GUI app
> > source would not even be in the main openhpi development
> tree.  Is that
> > right?
> >
> > --michael
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:16 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] HPI GUI application proposal
> >>
> >>
> >> My proposal is to organize it in the same way as for existing
> >> hpiview or
> >> pyOpenHPI:
> >> - openhpi and hpiview are in the same SVN repo. (not sure
> >> about the same)
> >> - separate tarball hpiview-$version.tar.gz
> >>
> >>   Anton Pak
> >>
> >> > Anton -
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps I'm getting ahead of myself here - but it sounds
> >> like the HPI GUI
> >> > app source code could be included in the OpenHPI project -
> >> but that the
> >> > user would be responsible for downloading the QT4
> >> development/runtime kit
> >> > prior to building it?  If this is what you are envisioning,
> >> then the HPI
> >> > GUI app would have to have its own separate build target in
> >> the OpenHPI
> >> > makefile - so that user can still build the rest of the
> >> OpenHPI (including
> >> > the clients) without having the QT4 stuff present.  I would
> >> not want to
> >> > require/force users to load the QT4 stuff if they don't
> >> care about using
> >> > the new HPI GUI app.
> >> >
> >> > So the only dependency on QT4, in the above description, is
> >> the HPI GUI
> >> > app you are proposing.  Is that how you see it going?  My
> >> desire here is
> >> > for not adding new header file/code dependencies in the
> >> build chain for
> >> > stuff that is already working.  In other words, I should
> >> still be able to
> >> > build the existing OpenHPI and clients without having
> QT4 present.
> >> >
> >> > --michael
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:47 PM
> >> >> To: [email protected]
> >> >> Cc: '[email protected]'
> >> >> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] HPI GUI application proposal
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Michael,
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, it requires QT4.
> >> >> Yes, one need to have Qt4 for compilation (like glib or
> >> >> openssl for OpenHPI).
> >> >> Dan pointed out there is no problem with BSD app and GPL lib.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Anton -
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm assuming the HPI GUI application you are proposing
> >> >> requires the QT4
> >> >> > libraries to compile/run.  Is that right?
> >> >> > If QT4 is LGPL2/GPL3 - isn't that going to cause issues if
> >> >> we include
> >> >> > those libraries with OpenHPI - given that OpenHPI is BSD?
> >> >> I think it
> >> >> > would be an issue.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Or is your thinking: We include the GUI application source
> >> >> code in the
> >> >> > OpenHPI project - but in order for it to compile - the use
> >> >> must first
> >> >> > download the QT4 libraries?  In other words, we include the
> >> >> HPI GUI - but
> >> >> > not the QT4 libraries - in the OpenHPI project?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --michael
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:27 PM
> >> >> >> To: [email protected]
> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] HPI GUI application proposal
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Great! BSD license works!
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>    Anton Pak
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > [email protected] píše v ÄŒt 27. 05. 2010 v
> >> >> >> 16:03 -0400:
> >> >> >> >> 1. We are fine with BSD license and PPS copyright
> note in the
> >> >> >> >> source files. In the same fashion like in OpenHPI
> >> source code.
> >> >> >> >> However QT4 is LGPL2/GPL3 and I read there were
> >> incompatibility
> >> >> >> >> issues with the original BSD license.
> >> >> >> >> Do you have any thougth on this topic?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I think these URLs can help
> >> >> >> > http://tinyurl.com/34p65yc
> >> >> >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ
> >> >> >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Dan
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> ----------------
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> >> >> >> > [email protected]
> >> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> ----------------
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> >> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> ----------------
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> >> >> > [email protected]
> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> ----------------
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----------------
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

Reply via email to