Well,

Now I need a guidance about how to add it into openhpi repository and a good
name for application. After that - ready to add!

   Anton Pak

> Anton -
>
> I agree that is the right place for this.
>
> --michael
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:35 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: '[email protected]'
>> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] HPI GUI application proposal
>>
>>
>> Corrent.
>>
>> I suggest new subdirectory here:
>> http://openhpi.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openhpi/
>>
>> At the same level as openhpi, hpiview, hpiview2, subagent.
>>
>>    Anton Pak
>>
>> > Anton -
>> >
>> > That sounds good.  So in this proposed organization, the HPI GUI app
>> > source would not even be in the main openhpi development
>> tree.  Is that
>> > right?
>> >
>> > --michael
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:16 PM
>> >> To: [email protected]
>> >> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] HPI GUI application proposal
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> My proposal is to organize it in the same way as for existing
>> >> hpiview or
>> >> pyOpenHPI:
>> >> - openhpi and hpiview are in the same SVN repo. (not sure
>> >> about the same)
>> >> - separate tarball hpiview-$version.tar.gz
>> >>
>> >>   Anton Pak
>> >>
>> >> > Anton -
>> >> >
>> >> > Perhaps I'm getting ahead of myself here - but it sounds
>> >> like the HPI GUI
>> >> > app source code could be included in the OpenHPI project -
>> >> but that the
>> >> > user would be responsible for downloading the QT4
>> >> development/runtime kit
>> >> > prior to building it?  If this is what you are envisioning,
>> >> then the HPI
>> >> > GUI app would have to have its own separate build target in
>> >> the OpenHPI
>> >> > makefile - so that user can still build the rest of the
>> >> OpenHPI (including
>> >> > the clients) without having the QT4 stuff present.  I would
>> >> not want to
>> >> > require/force users to load the QT4 stuff if they don't
>> >> care about using
>> >> > the new HPI GUI app.
>> >> >
>> >> > So the only dependency on QT4, in the above description, is
>> >> the HPI GUI
>> >> > app you are proposing.  Is that how you see it going?  My
>> >> desire here is
>> >> > for not adding new header file/code dependencies in the
>> >> build chain for
>> >> > stuff that is already working.  In other words, I should
>> >> still be able to
>> >> > build the existing OpenHPI and clients without having
>> QT4 present.
>> >> >
>> >> > --michael
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >> >> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:47 PM
>> >> >> To: [email protected]
>> >> >> Cc: '[email protected]'
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] HPI GUI application proposal
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Michael,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yes, it requires QT4.
>> >> >> Yes, one need to have Qt4 for compilation (like glib or
>> >> >> openssl for OpenHPI).
>> >> >> Dan pointed out there is no problem with BSD app and GPL lib.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Anton -
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm assuming the HPI GUI application you are proposing
>> >> >> requires the QT4
>> >> >> > libraries to compile/run.  Is that right?
>> >> >> > If QT4 is LGPL2/GPL3 - isn't that going to cause issues if
>> >> >> we include
>> >> >> > those libraries with OpenHPI - given that OpenHPI is BSD?
>> >> >> I think it
>> >> >> > would be an issue.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Or is your thinking: We include the GUI application source
>> >> >> code in the
>> >> >> > OpenHPI project - but in order for it to compile - the use
>> >> >> must first
>> >> >> > download the QT4 libraries?  In other words, we include the
>> >> >> HPI GUI - but
>> >> >> > not the QT4 libraries - in the OpenHPI project?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --michael
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >> >> From: [email protected]
>> >> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >> >> >> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:27 PM
>> >> >> >> To: [email protected]
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] HPI GUI application proposal
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Great! BSD license works!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>    Anton Pak
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > [email protected] píše v ÄŒt 27. 05. 2010 v
>> >> >> >> 16:03 -0400:
>> >> >> >> >> 1. We are fine with BSD license and PPS copyright
>> note in the
>> >> >> >> >> source files. In the same fashion like in OpenHPI
>> >> source code.
>> >> >> >> >> However QT4 is LGPL2/GPL3 and I read there were
>> >> incompatibility
>> >> >> >> >> issues with the original BSD license.
>> >> >> >> >> Do you have any thougth on this topic?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I think these URLs can help
>> >> >> >> > http://tinyurl.com/34p65yc
>> >> >> >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ
>> >> >> >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Dan
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> ----------------
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> >> >> >> > [email protected]
>> >> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> ----------------
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> >> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> ----------------
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> >> >> > [email protected]
>> >> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> ----------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> ----------------
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> ----------------
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openhpi-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

Reply via email to