Uli -

I'm wondering what your plans are with respect to submitting code for Domain 
Support for clients?

We're waiting on Lars Wetzel to finish up his work on the dynamic_simulator - 
once he gets the go-ahead from you to merge his branch with top-of-trunk.  
After the merge, the plan was to start the 2.15.0 release cycle - which should 
take 2 to 3 weeks - during which time only bug-fixes would be allowed on the 
top-of-trunk.  Would a later release cycle (e.g., 2.15.1 or 2.16.0) accomodate 
your changes for Domain Support in the HPI clients?

Note to all: I will be out of the office the week of June 21-25 - but the 
testing of 2.15.0 can proceed during this time.  The release would occur after 
I return on June 28.

--michael

Regards,
Michael Bishop
Enterprise Servers and Storage (ISB Linux/Telco)
Hewlett-Packard Company
3404 E. Harmony Rd.  Bldg. 5L, Post B7,  Mailstop 42
Fort Collins, CO  80528-9599
Phone: 970-898-4393
E-Mail: [email protected]




>> I guess we need to develop new whole multi-domain architecture before
>> starting to write code.
>> May be on daemon level. May be on baselib level.
>> What say?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kleber, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 7:14 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ] Domain
> Support for
> Clients
>
>
> Will do.
>
> I need to do some internal process clarification however, before
> I can send the full set of patches.
>
> Cheers,
> Uli

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

Reply via email to