Anton -

Thanks for clarifying.  I would still like to hear from Uli on his view of 
getting this work done in time for 2.15.0.

--michael



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 11:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ] Domain Support
> forClients
>
>
> Michael,
>
> I guess we decided to split this bussiness into several steps.
> The first one (which I believe will go into 2.15.0) is to
> add -D parameter in OpenHPI clients (hpitop, hpitree ...).
> So base library, daemon and plug-ins will be intact.
>
>    Anton Pak
>
> > Uli -
> >
> > The plan is to start the release cycle as soon as Lars is done with
> > merging his dynamic_simulator on top-of-trunk.   Roughly,
> we would freeze
> > the top-of-trunk on Monday, June 14 - and start the release
> cycle.  That
> > date can be push out a bit (maybe by a week) - but it is a
> bit concerning
> > to me that we are adding significant new code right at the
> last minute.
> > We've known about the new simulator for some time - but the
> addition of
> > domain support is fairly new.
> >
> > So the key question is: How close are you to having all of
> your domain
> > support code checked-in and fully unit-tested by June 14?
> >
> > I would also highly recommend that prior to checking in the
> domain support
> > code to top-of-trunk, that you run the hpitest-3.1.1
> conformance tests to
> > see if there is any regression in OpenHPI.  The hpitest is
> one of the key
> > metrics we use for checking overall OpenHPI quality prior
> to a release.
> > We've been running this metric extensively on Lars'
> simulator to make sure
> > we're not breaking anything by adding his plugin - and so
> far those tests
> > look good.  So assuming his merge goes okay - we're in good
> shape on his
> > plugin.  However, on the new domain support - because I am
> less familiar
> > with it - I'm less certain of how this will affect the
> stability of the
> > release.  In other words, what is your confidence level that the new
> > domain support code will not break existing OpenHPI functionality?
> >
> > --michael
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael Bishop
> > Enterprise Servers and Storage (ISB Linux/Telco)
> > Hewlett-Packard Company
> > 3404 E. Harmony Rd.  Bldg. 5L, Post B7,  Mailstop 42
> > Fort Collins, CO  80528-9599
> > Phone: 970-898-4393
> > E-Mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kleber, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:49 PM
> >> To: Bishop, Michael (ISB Linux/Telco)
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Subject: RE: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ]
> Domain Support
> >> forClients
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> I would very much like to contribute this domain support for
> >> 2.15.0. I am currently working on the other clients and need
> >> to check things like man pages.
> >> But I need also to that company internal process clarification,
> >> before I can send the final patch. I hope to get that within
> >> this week.
> >> When do you need the final patch?
> >> Cheers,
> >> Uli
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: ext Bishop, Michael (ISB Linux/Telco)
> >> > [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 11:13 PM
> >> > To: Kleber, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
> >> > Cc: '[email protected]'
> >> > Subject: RE: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ] Domain
> >> > Support forClients
> >> >
> >> > Uli -
> >> >
> >> > I'm wondering what your plans are with respect to submitting
> >> > code for Domain Support for clients?
> >> >
> >> > We're waiting on Lars Wetzel to finish up his work on the
> >> > dynamic_simulator - once he gets the go-ahead from you to
> >> > merge his branch with top-of-trunk.  After the merge, the
> >> > plan was to start the 2.15.0 release cycle - which should
> >> > take 2 to 3 weeks - during which time only bug-fixes would be
> >> > allowed on the top-of-trunk.  Would a later release cycle
> >> > (e.g., 2.15.1 or 2.16.0) accomodate your changes for Domain
> >> > Support in the HPI clients?
> >> >
> >> > Note to all: I will be out of the office the week of June
> >> > 21-25 - but the testing of 2.15.0 can proceed during this
> >> > time.  The release would occur after I return on June 28.
> >> >
> >> > --michael
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Michael Bishop
> >> > Enterprise Servers and Storage (ISB Linux/Telco)
> >> > Hewlett-Packard Company
> >> > 3404 E. Harmony Rd.  Bldg. 5L, Post B7,  Mailstop 42
> >> > Fort Collins, CO  80528-9599
> >> > Phone: 970-898-4393
> >> > E-Mail: [email protected]
> >> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> > lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openhpi-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Openhpi-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Openhpi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel

Reply via email to