Hi Michael, ok. So I will do all the other clients, but not hpionIBMblade. Cheers, Uli
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Bishop, Michael (ISB Linux/Telco) > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 5:22 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 > ]DomainSupport forClients > > Uli - > > It sounds like, from the description, that the plug-ins has > to run on the same device that they are managing. I'm not > sure if this client could benefit from domain support or not. > This client can always be changed later if needed. > > --michael > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kleber, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) > [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:36 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ]DomainSupport > > forClients > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > sorry, I forgot one thing. > > I think the client hpionIBMblade doesn't make much sense to > extend for > > the new option. > > > > Its man says: > > > > hpionIBMblade - An openhpi sample application that shows how two (2) > > openhpi plugins can be used to display and manage resources > of an IBM > > Blade with Basedboard Management Controller (BMC). > > DESCRIPTION > > hpionIBMblade shows how two (2) openhpi plugins can be used > to display > > and manage resources of an IBM Blade with basedboard Management > > Controller (BMC). > > Both the ipmi and snmp_bc plugin have the same IBM Blade target. > > Resources from both plugins are combined to show a complete > > view of the > > IBM Blade. > > @@ WARNING @@ RESTRICTIONS @@ WARNING @@ RESTRICTIONS @@ WARNING @@ > > RESTRICTIONS @@ > > This client application is designed to run **only** inband on an IBM > > Blade with Basedboard Management Controller (BMC). > > > > Maybe somebody from IBM has a different opinion? > > > > Cheers, > > Uli > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ext Kleber, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:37 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 > > > ]DomainSupport forClients > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > please see inline. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Uli > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ext Bishop, Michael (ISB Linux/Telco) > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 6:26 PM > > > > To: '[email protected]' > > > > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ] > > > > DomainSupport forClients > > > > > > > > Uli - > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > > > > > Here's what I'd like to see: > > > > > > > > 1. All code changes are backward compatible - so, for > > > > instance, a user can still run hpitop or hpitree without any > > > > options - and still get the default domain as before. Also, > > > > a user should not be required to configure openhpiclient.conf > > > > in order to use the client programs. In other words, we do > > > > not want to make the OpenHPI clients harder to use. > > > > > > Yes, that's cared for. > > > The clients don't use openhpiclient.conf at all. > > > Actually, the option -D works in a very simple way. The given > > > domainid is used in saHpiSessionOpen(). If the given domain is not > > > defined the call is rejected by the baselib. > > > If the -D is not used, the clients call saHpiSessionOpen using > > > SAHPI_UNSPECIFIED_DOMAIN_ID as it is today. > > > So all clients can be used as before. > > > > > > One exception: I fixed some bugs like: > > > - hpitree -n requires a value. There was no check. > > > Now there will be a printout of the usage text when there is > > > no value given, instead of ignoring the option. > > > > > > > > > > > 2. All client changes are tested, and checked-in by > > Monday, June 14. > > > > > > > > Please note that one of the release criteria for OpenHPI is > > > > that all of the OpenHPI clients must work. So we strongly > > > > depend on the clients as part of releasing OpenHPI. > > > > > > Ok. I try to check that also the existing options still work. > > > That's why I got confused with hpiinv. > > > > > > > > > > > I'll be happy to review the patches you create. Please post > > > > them to the OpenHPI developer list as soon as you can. Once > > > > they are reviewed, please check them into the top-of-trunk. > > > > > > > > On hpiinv - please post a defect or enhancement request on > > > > the issue you are seeing with the -v option. We can always > > > > look into this issue at a future release so that you are not > > > > getting sidetracked while you make your intended edits to the > > > > client programs. > > > > > > Yes. For that I need to test it a bit more. > > > > > > > > > > > Note that there are 16 OpenHPI client programs - so if you > > > > feel this is too much change for 2.15.0 in the short amount > > > > of time that is left - you can always do these changes in a > > > > later release. Please keep this in mind if the work proves > > > > to be more time consuming than you originally estimated. > > > > > > The 16th is hpigensimdata. I think I need to send the patch to > > > Lars for that, so he can use his newest version. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Uli > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --michael > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael Bishop > > > > Enterprise Servers and Storage (ISB Linux/Telco) > > > > Hewlett-Packard Company > > > > 3404 E. Harmony Rd. Bldg. 5L, Post B7, Mailstop 42 > > > > Fort Collins, CO 80528-9599 > > > > Phone: 970-898-4393 > > > > E-Mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Kleber, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 11:55 PM > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ] > > > Domain Support > > > > > forClients > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > yes, Anton is right. I plan changes for 2.15.0 only for > > > the clients > > > > > hpitop, hpitree, etc. So no changes to main code. > > > > > But I wanted to introduce the -D option for all > > clients, so it is > > > > > some editing work to do, which I could do easily till > > > next Monday - > > > > > if I don't find other problems. > > > > > I sometimes find options that are implemtented but not > > > > > documented in the > > > > > usage or man. So I try to fix that, too. > > > > > And yesterday I started on hpiinv and got the feeling that > > > > -v doesn't > > > > > work properly. Somehow the output without -v seems more > > > verbose than > > > > > with the option. > > > > > > > > > > I didn't do checkin on svn yet. Is it easy to do or can > > I send you > > > > > a patch or tar instead? The changes are not big and > can still be > > > > > done using patch (~ 80 lines per client). > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Uli > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: ext Bishop, Michael (ISB Linux/Telco) > > > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 7:16 PM > > > > > > To: '[email protected]' > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ] Domain > > > > > > Support forClients > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton - > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for clarifying. I would still like to hear from Uli > > > > > > on his view of getting this work done in time for 2.15.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > --michael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 11:01 AM > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Openhpi-devel] [ openhpi-Bugs-3011456 ] > > > > > Domain Support > > > > > > > forClients > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess we decided to split this bussiness into > > several steps. > > > > > > > The first one (which I believe will go into 2.15.0) is to > > > > > > > add -D parameter in OpenHPI clients (hpitop, hpitree ...). > > > > > > > So base library, daemon and plug-ins will be intact. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton Pak > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uli - > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > ---------------- > > > > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > > > > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > > > > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Openhpi-devel mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ---------------- > > > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > > > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > > > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Openhpi-devel mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------- > > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > > _______________________________________________ > > Openhpi-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Openhpi-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Openhpi-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openhpi-devel
