On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:28:43AM -0800, Tom Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 14:48 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Umm, you IB guys had lots of strange ideas on what code was acceptable > > until Roland stepped ahead and started the rewrite of the codebase. > > Don't worry. We have learned. We will clean it up. The code with be > in kernel normal form before ever seeing lkml. > > > Similarly even if we agree on a higher-level API not much of the > > existing code would be of any use. > > The *DAPL API is already decided in a spec. If we change it, it will > become lose compliance.
Who cares? Specs don't matter at all for kernel APIs. The kDAPL API as-is is won't go in the kernel, and no amount of cosmetic cleanup can change that. _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
