Hi Bryan, On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 12:16, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > Here is a first cut at the set of components (protocols, drivers, > userspace bits) that I think we should be supporting in 1.0. Please > look over it and let me know if I'm missing anything. > > HCA support (both kernel driver and userspace verbs components): > > * ehca > * ipath > * mthca > > IB protocols: > > * IPoIB > * RC > * SDP > * SRQ > * UC > * UD
I don't understand RC, UC, UD being separately listed here. > Userland software: > > * libibverbs > * libsdp > * opensm There are diags as well as OpenSM in the management directory. Also, what about librdmacm ? libibcm ? > As far as I can tell, most of the rest of OpenIB userland (libibcm, > libibat, libibmad, etc) is logically part of OpenSM, libibmad (and libibcommon and libibumad) are but libibcm and libibat are not. I believe libibat as well as the core at and user_at are superceeded by addr and libibrdma. > can be treated as > such (I think Doug is already doing this with his Red Hat spec files) > and is unlikely to be used by other applications. Am I way off? > > Components that I don't know what to do about, and will likely want to > drop unless someone can vouch for them: > > * iSER > * SRP > * uDAPL Why not ? -- Hal > > > _______________________________________________ > openib-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ openib-general mailing list [email protected] http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
