On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 13:24 -0500, James Lentini wrote:
> uDAPL should be included. The different providers were developed to
> support 3 different OpenIB configurations: OpenIB verbs (when there
> was no user space CM), OpenIB verbs + IB CM, and OpenIB verbs + RDMA
> CM. I recommend you include the openib_cma provider and the user space
> RDMA cm library.
OK, thanks. Someone will need to write RPM spec files for these
components. Is this something someone at NetApp can do?
> kDAPL does not need to be in the release, although it would be trivial
> to include it.
My understanding is that kDAPL has been vetoed for inclusion in the
upstream kernel, so I do not currently see any point in shipping it.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
<b
_______________________________________________
openib-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
