I am 99% confident that *our* beloved Tony was not part of the R&B group from Oakland, briefly popular in the 90s.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony!_Toni!_Ton%C3%A9!


On 7/17/13 2:33 PM, Don Thibeau wrote:
Paul

I don't think "Tony Tony Tony"  is a good name for a working group :)

Don Thibeau
The OpenID Foundation <http://openid.net>



On Jul 17, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Paul Madsen wrote:

Tony Tony Tony, how I've missed our time together

The WG's mandate is to profile OIDC to enable an SSO model for native mobile applications.

Can you suggest a better (concise & memorable) descriptor for a mail list identifier?

paul

On 7/17/13 2:17 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:

That’s a totally useless name

*From:*openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net [mailto:openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net] *On Behalf Of *Paul Madsen
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:59 AM
*To:* Mike Jones
*Cc:* John Bradley; sp...@openid.net; John Ehrig; Don Thibeau
*Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

that list name is fine

thanks

On 7/17/13 1:51 PM, Mike Jones wrote:

    John, are you able to create the new mailing list at
    lists.openid.net <http://lists.openid.net> or do we have to ask
    supp...@osuosl.org <mailto:supp...@osuosl.org> for the list
    creation?

    Paul and other WG creators, what name do you want the list to
    have?  openid-specs-native-sso?

    -- Mike

    *From:*Don Thibeau [mailto:d...@oidf.org]
    *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:03 AM
    *To:* Paul Madsen
    *Cc:* n-sakimura; John Ehrig; openid-specs@lists.openid.net
    <mailto:openid-specs@lists.openid.net>; John Bradley; Mike Jones
    *Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

    John Ehrig can set up the web site space and the online Docusign
    process for IPR collection.  If done right away it saves all
    concerned lots of time and hassle.

    Don Thibeau

    The OpenID Foundation <http://openid.net/>

    On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Paul Madsen wrote:




    Thanks Nat,

    Don, can you direct me to whomever I should work with on the WG
    list & page logistics?

    Paul

    On 7/16/13 6:08 AM, n-sakimura wrote:

        The WG formation is deemed to be approved per section 4.2 of
        the OpenID Process Document v.1.5 of 2009.

        A new mailing list should be established promptly per
        section 4.3 of the above document. Also, a WG web pages
        should be set up at openid.net <http://openid.net/>. You
        should also ask the secretary of the foundation to announce
        the first meeting of the WG, in which scope approval and the
        chairs selection should be done.

        Note: the first meeting can only be done after the WG has
        collected the IPR agreement from the participants, so it may
        not be as quick as you may wish, but it has to be done. BTW,
        NRI's agreement is already in as we have a blanket agreement
        like Google.

        Nat

        (2013/07/15 14:56), Paul Madsen wrote:


        Next steps?

        -----------
        Paul Madsen
        Ping Identity

        Anthony Nadalin<tony...@microsoft.com>
        <mailto:tony...@microsoft.com> wrote:



        I believe if you dig you will see that there is potential
        for IPR from both Apple and Facebook.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net
        <mailto:openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net>
        [mailto:openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of
        n-sakimura
        Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:20 PM
        To: openid-specs@lists.openid.net
        <mailto:openid-specs@lists.openid.net>
        Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group

        Could you kindly spell it out?

         From what I have been hearing, Facebook was just using fast
        application switch, which is nothing more than Self-issued
        thing that we have, and iOS's native login support given to
        facebook, twitter, and Weibo.
        Perhaps you are thinking of something else.

        Of course, I could be complete wrong. I should probably read
        https://developers.facebook.com/docs/howtos/ios-6/
        and

        
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233


        as well.

        Having said that, if Apple's interface is not open, perhaps
        it is a task for an industry consortia like OpenID
        Foundation to go and ask Apple to open up the API for other
        IdPs as well. Do not know if they are going to listen, but
        still, it might be our duty to try.

        Nat

        (2013/07/04 7:30), Anthony Nadalin wrote:


        I also have a concern that we might be infringing on the
        Facebook SSO
        (iOS) IPR with this effort.




-- Nat Sakimura (n-sakim...@nri.co.jp
        <mailto:n-sakim...@nri.co.jp>)
        Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
        Tel:+81-3-6274-1412 <tel:+81-3-6274-1412> Fax:+81-3-6274-1547

        PLEASE READ:
        The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
        intended for the named recipient(s) only.
        If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are
        hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution
        or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If
        you have received this message in error, please notify the
        sender immediately and delete your copy from your system.
        _______________________________________________
        specs mailing list
        sp...@lists.openid.net <mailto:sp...@lists.openid.net>
        http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs



        _______________________________________________
        specs mailing list
        sp...@lists.openid.net <mailto:sp...@lists.openid.net>
        http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs




_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs

Reply via email to