Amen! -cmort
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Paul Madsen <[email protected]> wrote: > this reminds me of the IETF SCIM-reacronymizing exercise > > the group was approved & chartered under the name 'Native SSO' . Those who > understand what the intent of the work is all agree that the name is an > accurate description of the work. > > Tony didnt like the name as proposed in the charter - but it was approved > nonetheless. > > So why are we still arguing? > > paul > > ps. I wonder if the proposers of 'Backplane', or ' AB/Connect' ,both > wonderfully descriptive, faced the same > > On 7/17/13 3:07 PM, Mike Jones wrote: > > So you’d prefer that the work be called something closer to “Native > Application Authorization”?**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Anthony Nadalin > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:50 AM > *To:* Paul Madsen; Don Thibeau > *Cc:* Mike Jones; John Bradley; [email protected]; John Ehrig > *Subject:* RE: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group**** > > ** ** > > I would have been too young back in the 90s**** > > ** ** > > I don’t like SSO in the name as this is basically this is just a way to > authorize an app to interact with one or more resource serves on your behalf > **** > > ** ** > > *From:* Paul Madsen [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] > > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:39 AM > *To:* Don Thibeau > *Cc:* Anthony Nadalin; Mike Jones; John Bradley; [email protected]; John > Ehrig > *Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group**** > > ** ** > > I am 99% confident that *our* beloved Tony was not part of the R&B group > from Oakland, briefly popular in the 90s..... > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony!_Toni!_Ton%C3%A9<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony%21_Toni%21_Ton%C3%A9> > !**** > > On 7/17/13 2:33 PM, Don Thibeau wrote:**** > > Paul **** > > ** ** > > I don't think "Tony Tony Tony" is a good name for a working group :)**** > > ** ** > > Don Thibeau**** > > The OpenID Foundation <http://openid.net>**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Paul Madsen wrote:**** > > ** ** > > Tony Tony Tony, how I've missed our time together > > The WG's mandate is to profile OIDC to enable an SSO model for native > mobile applications. > > Can you suggest a better (concise & memorable) descriptor for a mail list > identifier? > > paul**** > > On 7/17/13 2:17 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:**** > > That’s a totally useless name **** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Paul Madsen > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:59 AM > *To:* Mike Jones > *Cc:* John Bradley; [email protected]; John Ehrig; Don Thibeau > *Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group**** > > **** > > that list name is fine > > thanks**** > > On 7/17/13 1:51 PM, Mike Jones wrote:**** > > John, are you able to create the new mailing list at lists.openid.net or > do we have to ask [email protected] for the list creation?**** > > **** > > Paul and other WG creators, what name do you want the list to have? > openid-specs-native-sso?**** > > **** > > -- Mike**** > > **** > > *From:* Don Thibeau [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:03 AM > *To:* Paul Madsen > *Cc:* n-sakimura; John Ehrig; [email protected]; John > Bradley; Mike Jones > *Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group**** > > **** > > John Ehrig can set up the web site space and the online Docusign process > for IPR collection. If done right away it saves all concerned lots of time > and hassle.**** > > **** > > **** > > Don Thibeau**** > > The OpenID Foundation <http://openid.net/>**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Paul Madsen wrote:**** > > > > > **** > > Thanks Nat, > > Don, can you direct me to whomever I should work with on the WG list & > page logistics? > > Paul**** > > On 7/16/13 6:08 AM, n-sakimura wrote:**** > > The WG formation is deemed to be approved per section 4.2 of the OpenID > Process Document v.1.5 of 2009. > > A new mailing list should be established promptly per section 4.3 of the > above document. Also, a WG web pages should be set up at openid.net. You > should also ask the secretary of the foundation to announce the first > meeting of the WG, in which scope approval and the chairs selection should > be done. > > Note: the first meeting can only be done after the WG has collected the > IPR agreement from the participants, so it may not be as quick as you may > wish, but it has to be done. BTW, NRI's agreement is already in as we have > a blanket agreement like Google. > > Nat > > (2013/07/15 14:56), Paul Madsen wrote: > > > **** > > Next steps? > > ----------- > Paul Madsen > Ping Identity > > Anthony Nadalin<[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > **** > > I believe if you dig you will see that there is potential for IPR from > both Apple and Facebook. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of n-sakimura > Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:20 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group > > Could you kindly spell it out? > > From what I have been hearing, Facebook was just using fast application > switch, which is nothing more than Self-issued thing that we have, and > iOS's native login support given to facebook, twitter, and Weibo. > Perhaps you are thinking of something else. > > Of course, I could be complete wrong. I should probably read > https://developers.facebook.com/docs/howtos/ios-6/ > and > > > http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233 > > as well. > > Having said that, if Apple's interface is not open, perhaps it is a task > for an industry consortia like OpenID Foundation to go and ask Apple to > open up the API for other IdPs as well. Do not know if they are going to > listen, but still, it might be our duty to try. > > Nat > > (2013/07/04 7:30), Anthony Nadalin wrote: > > > **** > > I also have a concern that we might be infringing on the Facebook SSO > (iOS) IPR with this effort. **** > > > > > -- > Nat Sakimura ([email protected]) > Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. > Tel:+81-3-6274-1412 <+81-3-6274-1412> Fax:+81-3-6274-1547 > > PLEASE READ: > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for > the named recipient(s) only. > If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby > notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of > this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in > error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your > system. > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > > > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > >
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
