You said so eloquently what I was trying to say so lamely!
On 27 April 2014 16:36, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cool, thanks. > > > On 27 April 2014 16:35, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> wrote: > >> Read the jira ticket i referenced in my initial reply - tooltips and >> context menus create a window instance (=glass) and calls on glass have to >> be made on the javafx thread. >> >> Tom >> >> Von meinem iPhone gesendet >> >> > Am 27.04.2014 um 05:14 schrieb Felix Bembrick <felix.bembr...@gmail.com >> >: >> > >> > Why do tooltips and context menus matter? Is it because they will later >> be instantiated on the wrong thread when they "pop up"? >> > >> >> On 27 Apr 2014, at 7:04, Tom Schindl <tom.schi...@bestsolution.at> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> If you don't use Tooltips & context menus you can construct the >> scenegraph in any thread. >> >> >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> Von meinem iPhone gesendet >> >> >> >>> Am 26.04.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Tony Anecito <adanec...@yahoo.com>: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Tom this is also true for Swing and the EDT. I had heard years ago >> jre 8 was going to address this via 2 drawing threads and modularity but >> jigsaw was delayed and not sure what happened to the 2 drawing thread idea. >> I really wish we could instantiate windows in memory and when needed draw >> them. The user experience and perception of java would be so much better >> for the client side. If someone on the java client side knows how to do >> this I would love to try it to verify it. >> >>> >> >>> Best Regards, >> >>> Tony Anecito >> >>>> On Saturday, April 26, 2014 11:39 AM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> At e(fx)clipse we have an FXML to Java translator who removes all the >> >>>> reflection overhead from FXML. It does not yet support all FXML >> features >> >>>> but we are steadily improving it and with test cases we are able to >> fix >> >>>> problems quite fast. Maybe this is an option for you? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> That would be very interesting to try, yes please! Where can I find >> it? My >> >>> project is Java 8 based so that's no problem. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >
