Yes, apologies for that link, please ignore it, I only read the first part of that article and should have vetted it more closely before relaying.
I am academically curious about the concept of ART though, whether JavaFX works with it and if it is better to use a VM style runtime or AOT style variant when targeting deployment of JavaFX to mobile devices. I guessing the current JavaFX Android port would just work out of the box with ART because it is targeting the Dalvik runtime and as far as I understand ART will just take the Dalvik bytecode and compile it to the native device code when an app is installed on the device. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Palmer [mailto:swpal...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 5:46 PM To: John Smith Cc: Herve Girod; Pedro Duque Vieira; OpenJFX Mailing List Subject: Re: JavaFX at JavaOne 2014 That first article was so wrong about nearly everything mentioned in it that it made me want to vomit. On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:31 PM, John Smith <john_sm...@symantec.com> wrote: > I don't know much about Android, but does it have to be a VM, or could you > use ART or an ART equivalent: > > http://www.extremetech.com/computing/170677-android-art-google-finally-moves-to-replace-dalvik-to-boost-performance-and-battery-life > https://source.android.com/devices/tech/dalvik/art.html > > John
