Where does java packager fit in this?
> On May 15, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple weeks on the > OpenJFX project: > > 1. As mentioned last week, we now have EA builds of OpenJFX 11 on java.net > [1]. We intend to update this roughly weekly. Currently the build numbers > match the corresponding JDK build number, but that will not necessarily be > the case going forward, so don't assume that they are in sync. > > 2. Barring any build or staging issues, this week's OpenJFX 11 EA build will > include the jmods as mentioned earlier [2] [3] > > 3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with > jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. > > 4. After jdk-11+14 is posted on java.net, and FX is no longer included in JDK > 11, we will start using openjfx-11 as the fix version in JBS to distinguish > it from JDK 11. We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 around the same > time as JDK 11, but using a different release number will help track the > actual content of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11. > > 5. Once this settles down, possibly later this week, I hope to restart the > discussion about OpenJFX policies, etc. I also hope to be a bit more > responsive over the coming days / weeks than I have been for the last 3-4 > weeks. Getting the standalone OpenJFX working and removing JavaFX from the > JDK was quite time consuming as you can probably imagine. > > If you have any general comments or questions about any of this, please reply > to this thread. We may want to split out more detailed discussions into their > own thread to make it easier to follow. > > -- Kevin > > [1] http://jdk.java.net/openjfx/ > > [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-May/021856.html > [3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202368 >
