Yes, the source code for javapackager is fully open source.
-- Kevin
On 5/16/2018 1:05 PM, Michael Ennen wrote:
Is the source code for javapackager fully open source?
Thanks.
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX
(and has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the
standalone JavaFX bundles, and doesn't really fit in a standalone
FX release.
We are looking at the possibility of providing a replacement
packaging tool in OpenJDK.
-- Kevin
On 5/15/2018 3:16 PM, Alan Snyder wrote:
Where does java packager fit in this?
On May 15, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Kevin Rushforth
<kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
<mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple
weeks on the OpenJFX project:
1. As mentioned last week, we now have EA builds of
OpenJFX 11 on java.net <http://java.net> [1]. We intend to
update this roughly weekly. Currently the build numbers
match the corresponding JDK build number, but that will
not necessarily be the case going forward, so don't assume
that they are in sync.
2. Barring any build or staging issues, this week's
OpenJFX 11 EA build will include the jmods as mentioned
earlier [2] [3]
3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week.
Starting with jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11
will not include JavaFX.
4. After jdk-11+14 is posted on java.net
<http://java.net>, and FX is no longer included in JDK 11,
we will start using openjfx-11 as the fix version in JBS
to distinguish it from JDK 11. We still expect to do a
release of JavaFX 11 around the same time as JDK 11, but
using a different release number will help track the
actual content of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11.
5. Once this settles down, possibly later this week, I
hope to restart the discussion about OpenJFX policies,
etc. I also hope to be a bit more responsive over the
coming days / weeks than I have been for the last 3-4
weeks. Getting the standalone OpenJFX working and removing
JavaFX from the JDK was quite time consuming as you can
probably imagine.
If you have any general comments or questions about any of
this, please reply to this thread. We may want to split
out more detailed discussions into their own thread to
make it easier to follow.
-- Kevin
[1] http://jdk.java.net/openjfx/
[2]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-May/021856.html
<http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-May/021856.html>
[3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202368
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202368>
--
Michael Ennen
