Is the source code for javapackager fully open source? Thanks.
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and > has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone > JavaFX bundles, and doesn't really fit in a standalone FX release. > > We are looking at the possibility of providing a replacement packaging > tool in OpenJDK. > > -- Kevin > > > On 5/15/2018 3:16 PM, Alan Snyder wrote: > >> Where does java packager fit in this? >> >> >> On May 15, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple weeks on the >>> OpenJFX project: >>> >>> 1. As mentioned last week, we now have EA builds of OpenJFX 11 on >>> java.net [1]. We intend to update this roughly weekly. Currently the >>> build numbers match the corresponding JDK build number, but that will not >>> necessarily be the case going forward, so don't assume that they are in >>> sync. >>> >>> 2. Barring any build or staging issues, this week's OpenJFX 11 EA build >>> will include the jmods as mentioned earlier [2] [3] >>> >>> 3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with >>> jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. >>> >>> 4. After jdk-11+14 is posted on java.net, and FX is no longer included >>> in JDK 11, we will start using openjfx-11 as the fix version in JBS to >>> distinguish it from JDK 11. We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 >>> around the same time as JDK 11, but using a different release number will >>> help track the actual content of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11. >>> >>> 5. Once this settles down, possibly later this week, I hope to restart >>> the discussion about OpenJFX policies, etc. I also hope to be a bit more >>> responsive over the coming days / weeks than I have been for the last 3-4 >>> weeks. Getting the standalone OpenJFX working and removing JavaFX from the >>> JDK was quite time consuming as you can probably imagine. >>> >>> If you have any general comments or questions about any of this, please >>> reply to this thread. We may want to split out more detailed discussions >>> into their own thread to make it easier to follow. >>> >>> -- Kevin >>> >>> [1] http://jdk.java.net/openjfx/ >>> >>> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-May/ >>> 021856.html >>> [3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202368 >>> >>> > -- Michael Ennen
