Alright great, no complaints from me then :). On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com > wrote:
> Yes, the source code for javapackager is fully open source. > > -- Kevin > > > > On 5/16/2018 1:05 PM, Michael Ennen wrote: > > Is the source code for javapackager fully open source? > > Thanks. > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth < > kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and >> has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone >> JavaFX bundles, and doesn't really fit in a standalone FX release. >> >> We are looking at the possibility of providing a replacement packaging >> tool in OpenJDK. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> On 5/15/2018 3:16 PM, Alan Snyder wrote: >> >>> Where does java packager fit in this? >>> >>> >>> On May 15, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple weeks on the >>>> OpenJFX project: >>>> >>>> 1. As mentioned last week, we now have EA builds of OpenJFX 11 on >>>> java.net [1]. We intend to update this roughly weekly. Currently the >>>> build numbers match the corresponding JDK build number, but that will not >>>> necessarily be the case going forward, so don't assume that they are in >>>> sync. >>>> >>>> 2. Barring any build or staging issues, this week's OpenJFX 11 EA build >>>> will include the jmods as mentioned earlier [2] [3] >>>> >>>> 3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with >>>> jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. >>>> >>>> 4. After jdk-11+14 is posted on java.net, and FX is no longer included >>>> in JDK 11, we will start using openjfx-11 as the fix version in JBS to >>>> distinguish it from JDK 11. We still expect to do a release of JavaFX 11 >>>> around the same time as JDK 11, but using a different release number will >>>> help track the actual content of JavaFX 11 separately from JDK 11. >>>> >>>> 5. Once this settles down, possibly later this week, I hope to restart >>>> the discussion about OpenJFX policies, etc. I also hope to be a bit more >>>> responsive over the coming days / weeks than I have been for the last 3-4 >>>> weeks. Getting the standalone OpenJFX working and removing JavaFX from the >>>> JDK was quite time consuming as you can probably imagine. >>>> >>>> If you have any general comments or questions about any of this, please >>>> reply to this thread. We may want to split out more detailed discussions >>>> into their own thread to make it easier to follow. >>>> >>>> -- Kevin >>>> >>>> [1] http://jdk.java.net/openjfx/ >>>> >>>> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-May/ >>>> 021856.html >>>> [3] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202368 >>>> >>>> >> > > > -- > Michael Ennen > > > -- Michael Ennen