On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 23:27:08 GMT, Sai Pradeep Dandem <[email protected]> wrote:
>> **Issue:**
>> Using pseudo classes in programmatic query using Node.lookupAll() or
>> Node.lookup() gives unexpected results.
>>
>> **Cause:**
>> There is no check for checking the psuedo states matching in the applies()
>> method of SimpleSelector.java. So checking for "applies()" alone is not
>> sufficient in lookup() method.
>>
>> **Fix:**
>> Included an extra check for the psuedo states to match.
>
> Sai Pradeep Dandem has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> 8185831: Changes to doc as per review comments
I left a couple comments on the API docs.
modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/Node.java line 1957:
> 1955: * </p>
> 1956: * <p>
> 1957: * If two nodes, lets say NodeA and NodeB have same style class
> "myStyle" and NodeA has
Since this is a separate paragraph, please add "For example, " here to make it
clear that this is an example (and not normative specification). Maybe
something like this:
* For example, if two nodes, NodeA and NodeB, have the same ...
modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/Node.java line 1959:
> 1957: * If two nodes, lets say NodeA and NodeB have same style class
> "myStyle" and NodeA has
> 1958: * a pseudo state "myPseudo", then to find NodeA, the lookup
> method can be used as follows:
> 1959: * {@code scene.lookup(".myStyle:myPseudo");} or {@code
> scene.lookup(":myPseudo");}. If no pseudo class is specified
The sentence about what happens when no pseudo class is specified is true in
general and not really part of this example. I recommend moving it before the
two examples. And I think it could be worded more clearly.
* If the lookup selector does not specify a pseudo class, the lookup will
ignore pseudo class
* states; it will return the first matching node even if it contains
pseudo classes.
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1245#pullrequestreview-1702154246
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1245#discussion_r1374804258
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1245#discussion_r1374811707
