On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:02:56 GMT, Johan Vos <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> If we do this, then here are some possible names: >> >> * jfx.experimental.release >> * jfx.experimental.release.name >> * jfx.variant.release >> * jfx.variant.release.name >> * jfx.variant >> * jfx.feature.variant >> >> Thoughts? > >> If we do this, then here are some possible names: >> >> * jfx.experimental.release >> * jfx.experimental.release.name >> * jfx.variant.release >> * jfx.variant.release.name >> * jfx.variant >> * jfx.feature.variant >> >> Thoughts? > > I don't have objections against any of those. > If I have to vote, my vote would go to "jfx.feature.name" (which is not in > the list ;) ) because I associate variant rather with a single option from a > wider set (e.g. prism variants are sw, es2,,...) > But I am more than happy with any name on this list. Looks good now. @johanvos this should be ready for your review. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1637#issuecomment-2486219699
