On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 21:39:27 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Andy Goryachev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 27 commits:
>> 
>>  - rm junit4
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/8348736.rta.followup.2' into 
>> 8347359.rta.api.tests
>>  - ... and 17 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/703a9a90...0fb16fdc
>
> modules/jfx.incubator.richtext/src/test/java/test/jfx/incubator/scene/control/richtext/RichTextAreaTest.java
>  line 393:
> 
>> 391: 
>> 392:     @Test
>> 393:     public void getParagraphCount() {
> 
> Maybe also assert that the paragraph count is initially null?

1 instead of null, there is always at least one paragraph in this model.

> modules/jfx.incubator.richtext/src/test/java/test/jfx/incubator/scene/control/richtext/RichTextAreaTest.java
>  line 410:
> 
>> 408:         control.setModel(null);
>> 409:         // on second through, maybe this should return null
>> 410:         assertEquals(TextPos.ZERO, control.getParagraphEnd(0));
> 
> Are you keeping a list of such API questions?
> 
> In this case, I would think that asking for a paragraph that is out of range 
> would throw IOOBE. What does control.getParagraph(N) do when N is out of 
> range? This method should behave similarly.

good point, let me think about it.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1677#discussion_r2054990839
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1677#discussion_r2054991912

Reply via email to