On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:33:12 GMT, chuckyschluz <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Fixes [JDK-8311505](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8311505)
>> 
>> This PR uses `set(int index, int end, boolean isSet)` in 
>> `javafx.scene.control.MultipleSelectionModelBase` to avoid excessive calls 
>> to `indexOf` when deselecting continuous ranges of rows. 
>> 
>> `TableView`:
>> 
>> Item Count | Master Select | Fixed Select | Select Improv. | Master Deselect 
>> | Fixed Deselect | Deselect Improv.
>> -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
>> 16,384 | 7ms | 7ms | — | 83ms | 4ms | ~20.8x
>> 32,768 | 13ms | 12ms | ~1.1x | 331ms | 5ms | ~66.2x
>> 65,536 | 25ms | 17ms | ~1.5x | 1,283ms | 8ms | ~160.4x
>> 131,072 | 63ms | 28ms | ~2.3x | 5,142ms | 13ms | ~395.5x
>> 262,144 | 195ms | 58ms | ~3.4x | 20,526ms | 23ms | ~892.4x
>> 
>> `TreeTableView`:
>> 
>> Item Count | Master Select | Fixed Select | Select Improv. | Master Deselect 
>> | Fixed Deselect | Deselect Improv.
>> -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
>> 16,384 | 310ms | 313ms | — | 81ms | 1ms | ~81.0x
>> 32,768 | 1,451ms | 1,448ms | — | 315ms | 3ms | ~105.0x
>> 65,536 | 6,505ms | 6,629ms | — | 1,247ms | 6ms | ~207.8x
>> 131,072 | 37,034ms | 39,452ms | — | 5,045ms | 11ms | ~458.6x
>> 262,144 | 260,019ms | 256,854ms | — | 20,025ms | 22ms | ~910.2x
>> 
>> Passes all unit tests:
>> 
>> `.\gradlew.bat :controls:test`
>> `.\gradlew.bat :systemTests:test`
>> 
>> Thank you!
>
> chuckyschluz has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   move processContinguousRanges into the main function body

modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/ControlUtils.java 
line 188:

> 186:                 .collect(BitSet::new, BitSet::set, BitSet::or);
> 187: 
> 188:             for (int begin = added.nextSetBit(0); begin >= 0;) {

noticed these two blocks (here and L178) are identical except for the list and 
the boolean flag.  would it make sense to extract these into a separate 
function?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2100#discussion_r2962878561

Reply via email to