-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said:
| I'm not sure we want to do anything about the sysfs names, but we | should clean up any kernel-internal uses of "Neo1073" in preparation | for the Great Upstream Merge. Holger already did quite a bit of this | janitorial work a while ago, so I hope that the remaining changes | won't be too messy. OK, but "clean up any kernel-internal uses of "Neo1973"" to what then? Does it make sense if the sysfs names remain as neo1973? - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhGO/UACgkQOjLpvpq7dMqaUQCfUt6uGP79ZUf7uxeEA7e+prS5 oVoAniMZD+pQW+/cQXMJ14IsXAy5zV4O =Q4mX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
