Andy Green wrote: > OK, but "clean up any kernel-internal uses of "Neo1973"" to what then?
Hmm, this will be an interesting brainstorming exercise ;-) Some possibilities would be "Openmoko", "Neo", "GTA0x", "GTA01_02", or maybe we could follow the 24xx example and just use the name of the earliest member for which a given item applies, i.e., "GTA01" for GTA01 or GTA01+GTA02, and "GTA02" for GTA02-only. Of course, "wildcard" names like "GTA0x" or even "Openmoko" would probably cause a lot of changes for GTA04. In the same vein, many "GTA01_02" would become "GTA01_02_03". The most scalable is probably the 24xx approach, but then it can also be hellishly confusing. > Does it make sense if the sysfs names remain as neo1973? I guess the question is one of: - Do we want to have a flag day when we break much of our user space ? - Do we want to have "new" names plus lots of compatibility symlinks ? - Do we want to do a phased transition that includes all of the above ? Since this sort of transitions has ugly longs tails, I wouldn't object to a bit of imperfection in this case ... - Werner
