Andy Green wrote: > Wow it was actually "undefined at link time", not just my failure to > understand what you meant.
Yeah, sometimes, I don't think I have all the answers ;-) > If "neo" is OK why not just leave it alone as a similarly opaque token > "neo1973", job done. That sounds suspiciously close to cheating ;-) But yes, I can see the beauty of simplicity there (and compare it to the prospect of having to make countless mind-numbing changes) ... Anyone got a strong argument against keeping it simple and painless ? - Werner
