Hi Hendrik, On Wed, Jun 15, 2011, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > @Johan: Looking at [1], what are the reasons that osso-gwobex is > using FdOBEX instead of BtOBEX?
libopenobex is intended to be LGPL, but linking it with libbluetooth makes it effectively GPL. Because of this Maemo has never shipped a libopenobex with the Bluetooth specific parts compiled in and neither does MeeGo (AFAIK; I haven't actually verified this). Additionally, handling Bluetooth sockets within the application and passing them to FdOBEX is quite simple, and we even have GLib wrappers like BtIO which make using FdOBEX much more consistent with the rest of the BlueZ & obexd code bases than BtOBEX would ever do. Johan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Openobex-users mailing list Openobex-users@lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openobex-users
