On June 05, 2012 7:30 AM, David Riley wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Anders Montonen wrote: > > > On Jun 5, 2012, at 14:16, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > Aren't these the kind of problems Zeroconf was designed to solve? > > Not address distribution. Name resolution, yes, and if you were to > build a DHCP client into the device, you'd almost need it. Or IPv6 > automatically-assigned addresses. Unfortunately, Zeroconf isn't as > well-supported on Windows as it is elsewhere, though it's still > quite workable.
What's wrong with IPv4LL addressing? 169.254.x.x >From there, use mDNS to advertise the name (openocd.local or somesuch), and >you're golden. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list OpenOCD-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
