On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:01 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 16 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote: > > As suggsted by the first commit message, the final act will involve > > the removeal of the migration macros; however, that should wait > > until we near 1.0, in the event that further migration is required. > > What would you think makes a release deserve to be called "1.0"?
Basically, we need to run out of our list of "things to fix". That list is so long at present that I cannot fathom the code reaching 1.0 for at least another year of development. Or to be blunt: When It's Done. The lack of TODO items will justify it, so not anytime soon. Anything less than that, and it'd be little more than marketing hooey. --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
