On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Zach Welch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:42 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Zach Welch <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:01 -0700, David Brownell wrote: >> >> On Monday 16 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote: >> >> > As suggsted by the first commit message, the final act will involve >> >> > the removeal of the migration macros; however, that should wait >> >> > until we near 1.0, in the event that further migration is required. >> >> >> >> What would you think makes a release deserve to be called "1.0"? >> > >> > Basically, we need to run out of our list of "things to fix". That list >> > is so long at present that I cannot fathom the code reaching 1.0 for at >> > least another year of development. Or to be blunt: When It's Done. >> > The lack of TODO items will justify it, so not anytime soon. >> > >> > Anything less than that, and it'd be little more than marketing hooey. >> >> The code is being cleaned up at a frantic pace these days, which is >> great. When do you see that tapering off? > > 0.42.7 or so.... :) More directly: I don't.
There are two things that can make it level out: a) everything is fixed b) running out of steam... So I guess since it isn't going to be a, then the question is when b will occur. :-) -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
