On Tuesday 17 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:01 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > On Monday 16 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote: > > > As suggsted by the first commit message, the final act will involve > > > the removeal of the migration macros; however, that should wait > > > until we near 1.0, in the event that further migration is required. > > > > What would you think makes a release deserve to be called "1.0"? > > Basically, we need to run out of our list of "things to fix".
So there will never be a 1.0 release, then... > That list > is so long at present that I cannot fathom the code reaching 1.0 for at > least another year of development. Or to be blunt: When It's Done. > The lack of TODO items will justify it, so not anytime soon. > > Anything less than that, and it'd be little more than marketing hooey. Picking some number as especially magic is nothing but such hooey. :) _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
