On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Zach Welch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:01 -0700, David Brownell wrote: >> On Monday 16 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote: >> > As suggsted by the first commit message, the final act will involve >> > the removeal of the migration macros; however, that should wait >> > until we near 1.0, in the event that further migration is required. >> >> What would you think makes a release deserve to be called "1.0"? > > Basically, we need to run out of our list of "things to fix". That list > is so long at present that I cannot fathom the code reaching 1.0 for at > least another year of development. Or to be blunt: When It's Done. > The lack of TODO items will justify it, so not anytime soon. > > Anything less than that, and it'd be little more than marketing hooey.
The code is being cleaned up at a frantic pace these days, which is great. When do you see that tapering off? Minimally for the 0.4 release we'll have to wind down before Xmas sometime... -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
