What's wrong being open? This should be a open process, if the majority votes for "no" then the "yes" voters need to be more convincing.
Keeping things open isn't a bad idea, I find it strange that someone in the FOSS will even make this kind of remark. Should we maybe do everything behind closed doors? xming bkml wrote: > On Feb 23, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Ming-Wei Shih wrote: > > >> - Do we need a name change? >> > > Why is this being posed as an open question? > > For everyone who still doesn't know: In some countries it is not > legal to use the name OpenPBX (in category telephony/telecoms) > because of a trademark conflict. This certainly includes most of Asia > Pacific and Oceania, probably Europe, Middle East and Africa as well. > > rgds > benjk > _______________________________________________ > Openpbx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev > _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
