bkml wrote: > On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:14 PM, Ming-Wei Shih wrote: > > >> What's wrong being open? >> > > I was asking why the question is being posed even though it is known > that the name is not legally available in all countries where this > project has contributors and users. > And you got your answer. O P E N !!! > >> This should be a open process, if the majority votes for "no" then >> the "yes" >> voters need to be more convincing. >> > > Do you mean to suggest you can just ignore the law because of an > online poll? I presume that would be rather naive. > Since when is this breaking the law outside those countries? Openpbx is legal to use in a lot more countries than illegal countries. Democracy is about to respect the opinion of the majority and not about the individuals.
And please don't PUT words if my mouth, did I suggested anything? I merely said that the "yes" voters should be more convincing. If you have nothing better to do than putting words in my mouth and presuming that I am naive, please go troll elsewhere. xming _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
