Grandstream ATA's are known to work. Specifically I have used a Grandstream HT-286 ATA with openpbx as t.38 termination ( to tiff file, not as pstn gateway ) and it worked fine.
Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:42 PM Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] OpenPBX as T.38 PSTN gateway > No Hans, I new with OpenPBX and I don't know native T.38 implemetation > from > Steve. For now I will test it and can't recomended one. > My last answers based on known problems with T.38 implementation in real > world (mainly with Cisco media gw and Patton BRI/PRI gw) and many type of > end users ATA. > > turby > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johann > Steinwendtner > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 12:26 PM > To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] OpenPBX as T.38 PSTN gateway > > May I ask you again ? > > Have you tried app T38Gateway with your ATA models ? Or can you recommend > a > T38 media gateway ? > > Thanks again. > > Hans > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >> Many ATA have "own" T.38 implementation and works fine only between >> same ATA and does not work with "RFC" (or maybe "Cisco" :-) class ATA. >> For example, SPA2102 work (sometime :-) with other SPA2102, but not >> work with Cisco media gateway or other T.38 ATA. >> >> I thing, there is only one solution. Introduce correct T.38 >> implementation in some "known" open PBX and wait for ATA market answer. >> >> turby >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> Does T38Gateway actually work with those ATA's. I was trying the >> Grandstream model, and had different success: >> Sending T38 Faxes: >> >> from Faxmachine --> ATA --> oPBX with RxFAX works o.k. >> >> from Faxmachine --> ATA --> oPBX with T.38Gateway --> ZAP --> >> Faxmachine does work in 2 cases from 10 >> >> oPBX TxFAX --> ATA --> Fax Machine does not work, but thats seems to >> be known. >> >> Thanks for your response ! >> >> Hans >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openpbx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Openpbx-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users > > _______________________________________________ > Openpbx-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users _______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users
