Hi Geoff, I did have my doubts as to whther it was really t.38, however I did both a sip debug and udptl debug and verified the t.38 reinvite followed by the udptl traces on the openpbx console.
Craig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoffrey Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 5:51 PM Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] OpenPBX as T.38 PSTN gateway > Craig, are you sure it was actually using T.38. Some of the confusion of > the ATA scene is that, apparently, you could in fact be transmitting using > g 711 without realising it.... see a previous post from Steve some weeks > ago. > goffretus > > Craig Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grandstream ATA's are known to work. Specifically I have used a > Grandstream > HT-286 ATA with openpbx as t.38 termination ( to tiff file, not as pstn > gateway ) and it worked fine. > > Craig > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: "'OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" > > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] OpenPBX as T.38 PSTN gateway > > >> No Hans, I new with OpenPBX and I don't know native T.38 implemetation >> from >> Steve. For now I will test it and can't recomended one. >> My last answers based on known problems with T.38 implementation in real >> world (mainly with Cisco media gw and Patton BRI/PRI gw) and many type of >> end users ATA. >> >> turby >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johann >> Steinwendtner >> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 12:26 PM >> To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion >> Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] OpenPBX as T.38 PSTN gateway >> >> May I ask you again ? >> >> Have you tried app T38Gateway with your ATA models ? Or can you recommend >> a >> T38 media gateway ? >> >> Thanks again. >> >> Hans >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >>> Many ATA have "own" T.38 implementation and works fine only between >>> same ATA and does not work with "RFC" (or maybe "Cisco" :-) class ATA. >>> For example, SPA2102 work (sometime :-) with other SPA2102, but not >>> work with Cisco media gateway or other T.38 ATA. >>> >>> I thing, there is only one solution. Introduce correct T.38 >>> implementation in some "known" open PBX and wait for ATA market answer. >>> >>> turby >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> Does T38Gateway actually work with those ATA's. I was trying the >>> Grandstream model, and had different success: >>> Sending T38 Faxes: >>> >>> from Faxmachine --> ATA --> oPBX with RxFAX works o.k. >>> >>> from Faxmachine --> ATA --> oPBX with T.38Gateway --> ZAP --> >>> Faxmachine does work in 2 cases from 10 >>> >>> oPBX TxFAX --> ATA --> Fax Machine does not work, but thats seems to >>> be known. >>> >>> Thanks for your response ! >>> >>> Hans >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openpbx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openpbx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openpbx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users > > _______________________________________________ > Openpbx-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users > > > > --------------------------------- > Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and > always stay connected to friends. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Openpbx-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users > _______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users
