> I don't think that was a very good idea. There might be scripts that points 
> out
> the old filename. Getting rid of warnings is good, but this might break stuff.
> This patch was one of the reasons that I think we should put out a proper
> release before we change more things.
I think that's taking it too far, that hinders almost all progress.

Scripts that rely on individual filenames somewhere down the CPU core's sources 
are already broken. And even if they are to remain broken in this way, fixing 
them in this particular case should be trivial.

Regards,
  rdiez
_______________________________________________
OpenRISC mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc

Reply via email to