Hi Mahesh

The IMM objects and admin op are issued on the same node.
AMFD will ‘forward’ the admin op to AMFND on *another* node, where sometimes 
the object is not yet available.

Thanks
Gary

On 21/6/17, 5:14 pm, "A V Mahesh" <mahesh.va...@oracle.com> wrote:

    Hi Pravee/Gary,
    
    
    On 6/21/2017 12:13 PM, praveen malviya wrote:
    > Hi Gary,
    >
    > Is there any ticket in IMM for any related issue?
    > Both creation of SU and admin operation on it will go through IMM only.
    > I do not know how IMM handles it and how IMM spec talks about it.
    
    [AVM] Even we have problem of newly created IMM object is taking some 
    time to be available on other nodes
                 it will be a implementation problem and it is not related 
    to IMM specification .
    
    > Does IMM spec allow admin operation on a entity for which all synced 
    > IMMNDS (leaving non synced IMMNDS on the nodes joining the cluster) 
    > are not updated?
    
    [AVM] Again, this is also not related to  IMM specification ,  if we 
    resolve above this  issue will not rise .
    
    Gary, Is this issue you are facing in case where you are creating object 
    on one node and   admin operation performed on different node ?
    or on same same node ?
    
    -AVM
    
    On 6/21/2017 12:30 PM, Gary Lee wrote:
    > Hi Praveen
    >
    >  From talking with Zoran/Hung, the IMM behaviour is expected and correct.
    > I’m not sure about the last question.
    >
    > As you know, in AMFND, the trigger to read from IMM is from an AMFD 
message.
    > The CCB could be committed on the node where active AMFD resides, so I 
guess the admin op would be accepted regardless of the answer to your question.
    >
    > Gary
    >
    > On 21/6/17, 4:43 pm, "praveen malviya" <praveen.malv...@oracle.com> wrote:
    >
    >      Hi Gary,
    >      
    >      Is there any ticket in IMM for any related issue?
    >      Both creation of SU and admin operation on it will go through IMM 
only.
    >      I do not know how IMM handles it and how IMM spec talks about it.
    >      Does IMM spec allow admin operation on a entity for which all synced
    >      IMMNDS (leaving non synced IMMNDS on the nodes joining the cluster) 
are
    >      not updated?
    >      
    >      Thanks,
    >      Praveen
    >      
    >      On 15-Jun-17 1:11 PM, Gary Lee wrote:
    >      > On a congested network, sometimes a newly created IMM object can 
take some
    >      > time to be available on other nodes.
    >      >
    >      > In our test, a new SU is created on SC-1 and unlocked. But 
sometimes
    >      > it fails on a remote node due to:
    >      >
    >      > 2017-05-19 13:55:19 SC-2 osafamfnd[258]: ER 
amf_saImmOmSearchInitialize_o2 failed: 12
    >      >
    >      > To get around this, we will retry on SA_AIS_ERR_NOT_EXIST a few 
times.
    >      > ---
    >      >   src/amf/amfnd/util.cc | 15 +++++++++++++++
    >      >   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
    >      >
    >      > diff --git a/src/amf/amfnd/util.cc b/src/amf/amfnd/util.cc
    >      > index ed0905ce2..bca642eac 100644
    >      > --- a/src/amf/amfnd/util.cc
    >      > +++ b/src/amf/amfnd/util.cc
    >      > @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@
    >      >   #include <unistd.h>
    >      >   #include "osaf/configmake.h"
    >      >   #include "amf/amfnd/avnd.h"
    >      > +#include "base/osaf_time.h"
    >      > +
    >      > +extern struct ImmutilWrapperProfile immutilWrapperProfile;
    >      >
    >      >   const char *presence_state[] = {
    >      >       "OUT_OF_RANGE",         "UNINSTANTIATED",     
"INSTANTIATING",
    >      > @@ -335,6 +338,18 @@ SaAisErrorT amf_saImmOmSearchInitialize_o2(
    >      >                                                 scope, 
searchOptions, searchParam,
    >      >                                                 attributeNames, 
&searchHandle);
    >      >       }
    >      > +  } else if (rc == SA_AIS_ERR_NOT_EXIST) {
    >      > +    // it is possible for 'rootName' to be not yet available
    >      > +    // at the local immnd. Retry a few times to allow CCB to be 
propagated.
    >      > +    unsigned int nTries = 1;
    >      > +    while (rc == SA_AIS_ERR_NOT_EXIST &&
    >      > +      nTries < immutilWrapperProfile.nTries) {
    >      > +      osaf_nanosleep(&kHundredMilliseconds);
    >      > +      rc = immutil_saImmOmSearchInitialize_o2(immHandle, 
rootName.c_str(),
    >      > +        scope, searchOptions, searchParam,
    >      > +        attributeNames, &searchHandle);
    >      > +      nTries++;
    >      > +    }
    >      >     }
    >      >     return rc;
    >      >   }
    >      >
    >      
    >
    >
    >
    > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
    > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sdm.link_slashdot&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=Ua8D9LRbRt6_3fFyQghU61tppZpWmDKj9QGctDqRYQQ&m=3lVa-ymN89sIVfvS57TSd0edM74_gBo3GkkdaSxuTCA&s=WL9nnf9tO-B21XeTvgltME0cARW6eq0IpDLuJQocH_k&e=
    > _______________________________________________
    > Opensaf-devel mailing list
    > Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
    > 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.sourceforge.net_lists_listinfo_opensaf-2Ddevel&d=DwIGaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=Ua8D9LRbRt6_3fFyQghU61tppZpWmDKj9QGctDqRYQQ&m=3lVa-ymN89sIVfvS57TSd0edM74_gBo3GkkdaSxuTCA&s=5AyrQ2cwgH0HW6VfyB4nxYnHjDz-L_xk5n3HjZmw350&e=
    
    



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to